AfterFiat· Next Generation Stores of Value: Privacy, Proofs, Compute — v2.2

Versioned release

Next Generation Stores of Value: Privacy, Proofs, Compute

A Conditional Monetary Thesis for Verifiable Digital Infrastructure
Jason St George
v2.2 · 2026-08-29

This version is archived as its PDF. The current edition is at /v/4.1/.

No new claims: the two flagship measurement families, VerifyPrice and VerifyFlow, are audited equation-by-equation and hardened at ten defects — an aggregation double-count, a degenerate elasticity ratio, missing measurement contracts, and a conditional identification rule that was published as absolute. Every fix tightens an instrument; none relaxes one.

PDFs

Release notes

v2.2 — The Instrument-Hardening Pass

2026-08-29

Version 2.2 makes the thesis’s two flagship measurement families agree with the standards the rest of the document already holds itself to. VerifyPrice and VerifyFlow were audited end-to-end: every equation re-derived symbolically and verified numerically. The core derivations hold. The aggregation, specification, and anti-gaming layers behind them did not. Ten defects, now fixed.

Aggregation

  • The double-count in QexpQ^{\text{exp}}. The asset-level flow vector defined total exposure demand as QRC+QRDQ^{RC} + Q^{RD}, but QRDQ^{RD} consumed raw net creation — whose elasticity-driven component is already inside κ\kappa in QRCQ^{RC}. The same dollars were counted twice, and the overstatement propagated into MPR, the stress harness, and any red line reading on them. QRDQ^{RD} now consumes only the intercept-plus-residual component, per the decomposition rule Appendix H already stated — and the vector violated. Undecomposed creations are published flagged, not silently aggregated.
  • WNG aggregation and deflation. The Wrapper–Native Growth Gap feeds the triple-divergence composite and Red Line 8 but had no aggregation specification, while its adjacent Red Line 14 quantity already carried one. WNG is now specified: trailing four-quarter window, components summed as deflation-adjusted turnover, both unit- and USD-denominated rates published. Without the adjustment, an unadjusted WNG rises on a valuation artifact alone — the composite can fire on a phantom.
  • MPR gross and net. The Mechanical Pressure Ratio now publishes gross and net forms, mirroring the Wrapper Dominance Ratio’s stock/flow discipline: netting offsetting flows before the modulus erases the liquidity both sides consumed.

Domain

  • WRR is undefined at L=1L = 1 — the dominant wrapper class. The Wrapper Recycling Ratio divides by L−1L - 1, so it does not exist for an unlevered wrapper. The spot ETF — plausibly this asset’s largest wrapper — is exactly that. The degeneracy is correct behavior, not a bug: an unlevered wrapper has no rebalancing obligation, so there is nothing to recycle. The κ\kappa–WRR identity is now stated, the L=1L{=}1 publication rule fixed (publish ε\varepsilon; never a WRR column), and a wrapper-class applicability map added so classes without shares and NAV — perpetual futures above all — get named substitute constructions instead of fabricated readings.

Anti-gaming

  • The r(W)r(W) denominator had no contract. The verification numerator of the cost asymmetry ratio is produced under a multi-operator, signed-batch, adversarial-corpus regime. The production denominator was self-reported. A prover who inflates production cost drives r(W)r(W) down and the network looks more verification-asymmetric than it is. The denominator now carries the mirror of the numerator’s contract: reference cost models pinned like the reference kernel, independently estimated, published derivation — and where independent estimation is impossible, r(W)r(W) publishes as prover-favorable and unverified, unable to support a passing reading on chain link 3.

Estimation

  • The OLS upper-bound rule was conditional, not absolute. Simultaneity bias inflates the fitted elasticity, so OLS was published as an upper bound on amplification. But for a stale-priced underlying, errors-in-variables attenuation biases the estimate downward — and an attenuated OLS value bounds nothing. A staleness diagnostic is now published alongside, and where staleness is material, the reading publishes as unidentified rather than as a bound.

Specification

  • One canonical VerifyPrice tuple. Three tuple definitions lived across four sites. Appendix A now states the canonical five-field form and demotes the others to views of it, reconciling to the same receipts.
  • VerifyPower took the reciprocal of a vector. It is now a scalar on a pinned reference workload, with the workload declared and changed only with notice — the signal cannot be dressed by re-picking.
  • VerifyPrice_adj is a convenience summary. An expectation averages away the tail that resilience lives in. The per-state vector is load-bearing; no red line reads on the summary.
  • AffordabilityRatio improves when fees rise. The ratio falls when the denominator grows, so a protocol can pass the SLO while becoming less affordable. The ratio now publishes with its components; a falling ratio driven by a rising denominator is a deterioration wearing an improvement’s clothes.

Artifacts

The full edition is 381 pages; the brief is 19 pages. Both are checksummed; the citation record identifies v2.2 as canonical. No red line was relaxed, no threshold was moved, and no falsification condition was withdrawn.

Cite This Work

Jason St George. "Next Generation Stores of Value: Privacy, Proofs, Compute: A Conditional Monetary Thesis for Verifiable Digital Infrastructure". Version v2.2. /v/2.2/

Citation files