privacy · proofs · compute
v3.2 · checksummed
2026-08-30 · v2.3

v2.3 — the coherence pass

What this release is

v2.2 hardened the instruments. This release hardens the argument around them. A systematic audit — self-coherence, local coherence, and global coherence of every formula against every other — produced a severity-ranked queue of 125 findings. Every one is now remediated. No claim moved; several claims became true.

The two mathematical errors

The J→kWh dimensional error (Part IV). The published price model read c = e × p_energy + t95 × p_opp, multiplying Joules directly by a USD/kWh price — a 3.6-million-fold overstatement of the energy term, present since the model was written and made load-bearing by v2.2, which pinned cost percentiles to it. The derivation is now per-run and dimensionally sound: c_run = (e_run / 3.6×10⁶) × p_energy + t_run × p_opp, with cost percentiles computed as percentiles of per-run cost, never recomputed from percentile inputs. Appendix A’s bridge paragraph and the r(W) asymmetry ratio now consume the corrected model.

The WNG revaluation artifact, stated backwards (Part V). The wrapper–native growth gap claimed an unadjusted WNG rises when the asset’s price falls — a valuation artifact. The artifact is real but runs the other way: E^wrapper is a stock revalued with every tick while U^native accumulates at transaction prices, so a price rise can lift measured exposure growth on revaluation that no usage produced. The aggregation spec now unit-denominates both sides (revaluation stripped by construction), pins the trailing four-quarter window, and separates this deflator from Red Line 14-B’s workload unit-price deflator — same word, different deflators, both published.

Conventions the thesis now pins once

Red-line repairs

Instrument and schema repairs

Also fixed

Definitions repaired across Parts I–VI: the Value Capture Lemma’s failure clause (no monetary premium, not no value at all); the nine-requirements enumeration; the Work-Credit supply identity (lost wallets stay in outstanding, exit effective supply); the θ_t double-count in the price-impact equation; the φ_t “restated lemma” false equivalence; RCR and NUS denominators; CSR’s relationship to dollar-weighted IRR; the collateral level/slope vocabulary; the unlevered-WRR publication rule in the executive memo. Placeholder caps (40% chip-family, 10% reachability) instantiated. Vignette arithmetic annotated as illustrative. The base-rate defense is restated in its honest two-move form: empty precedent rows are evidence against; the change-of-kind argument is why that evidence is not dispositive.

Full details: Appendix J (release history) and the v2.3 CHANGELOG entry.