Abstract. Abstract

Jason St George. "Abstract. Abstract" in Next Generation Stores of Value: Privacy, Proofs, Compute. Version v1.9. /v/1.9/read/front-matter/abstract/

Abstract

Under sustained administrative and financial repression, a bearer asset may earn monetary premium if holding it preserves private settlement, portable proof, and access to verified compute after ordinary legal, custodial, and platform substitutes weaken. That premium is conditional: the full service path must remain stress-deliverable through independently substitutable physical routes; demand must not bypass the asset; a persistent, self-custodied, loss-bearing holder constituency must absorb residual financial risk; and the duration-bearing credit required to build the infrastructure must remain explicitly separate from the monetary object. Privacy, Proofs, and Compute may share that asset, but whether they should is an empirical architectural question rather than a premise.

The protocol and its price are different machines. The protocol machine supplies the triad and routes its demand through fees, burns, collateral, and constrained issuance. The market machine wraps the resulting asset into custody claims, funds, derivatives, leverage, and allocation rules. Either machine can move without the other. Price is something to explain, not evidence to cite.

Fees, burns, and collateral establish a competitively priced cash-flow claim and a balance-sheet floor—both of which a discounted-cash-flow valuation reproduces and neither of which is a monetary premium. The monetary claim rests on something else: a state-contingent holder-side service flow, the bearer’s ability to transact, prove, hold, and exit when the substitutes for proofs, courts, and custodians have stopped working. That mechanism is standard; this thesis argues it and declines to size it.

The competitor to an open verifiable stack is accordingly not fiat but a competent closed sovereign stack—state-integrated energy, industry, compute, payments, and identity—which may win on cost, uptime, and build speed while inverting who ends up sovereign. Two such stacks are now under construction rather than one. Duration-neutrality of the monetary object is a repression-resistance requirement, not a theory of capital formation: reserve collateral and the construction interval of plants are different functions, and proofs must not become the bond. The thesis publishes fifteen red lines: named, measurable conditions any one of which would retire it. §6: The Triad and the Monetary Candidate states the argument as a chain of nine links and names the links it rates weakest.

Tip: hover a heading to reveal its permalink symbol for copying.